| ID | Date | Team A | Team B | Tournament | Phase | Result | Opponent | F | A | Diff | Sum | Robert S | Opponent | ES Robert S | Adjustment | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26649 | Nov 10 2024 | James L | 3 | 5 | Robert S | World Cup XXII (Nottingham) | Round 1 - Group C | Win | James L | 5 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 1770 | 1753 | 52.4% | +15.2 |
| 16498 | Dec 11 2009 | Robert S | 7 | 3 | James L | London XXVI | - | Win | James L | 7 | 3 | 4 | 10 | 1978 | 1791 | 74.6% | +8.1 |
| 16492 | Dec 11 2009 | James L | 3 | 3 | Robert S | London XXVI | - | - | James L | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 1978 | 1791 | 74.6% | -7.9 |
| 16484 | Dec 11 2009 | Robert S | 7 | 7 | James L | London XXV | - | - | James L | 7 | 7 | 0 | 14 | 1981 | 1800 | 73.9% | -7.7 |
| 16478 | Dec 11 2009 | James L | 2 | 3 | Robert S | London XXV | - | Win | James L | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1981 | 1800 | 73.9% | +8.3 |
| 7619 | Jul 29 2006 | James L | 1 | 9 | Robert S | Manchester II | - | Win | James L | 9 | 1 | 8 | 10 | 1855 | 1772 | 61.7% | +12.3 |
| 6917 | Feb 05 2006 | James L | 1 | 5 | Robert S | London Marathon | - | Win | James L | 5 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 1924 | 1890 | 54.9% | +14.4 |
| 5731 | Oct 04 2005 | James L | 2 | 4 | Robert S | London XVII | - | Win | James L | 4 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 1844 | 1923 | 38.9% | +19.6 |
| 5130 | Jan 30 2005 | Robert S | 2 | 2 | James L | London XVI | - | - | James L | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1916 | 1891 | 53.6% | -1.1 |
| 5115 | Jan 30 2005 | James L | 5 | 2 | Robert S | London XVI | - | Loss | James L | 2 | 5 | -3 | 7 | 1916 | 1891 | 53.6% | -17.1 |
| 4543 | Sep 24 2004 | James L | 4 | 3 | Robert S | London XV | - | Loss | James L | 3 | 4 | -1 | 7 | 1974 | 1882 | 62.9% | -20.1 |
| 4374 | Jun 05 2004 | James L | 2 | 6 | Robert S | Nottingham | - | Win | James L | 6 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 1970 | 1889 | 61.4% | +12.4 |
| 4238 | Jun 05 2004 | Robert S | 8 | 4 | James L | Nottingham | - | Win | James L | 8 | 4 | 4 | 12 | 1970 | 1889 | 61.4% | +12.4 |
| 3681 | Dec 16 2003 | James L | 5 | 3 | Robert S | London XIII | - | Loss | James L | 3 | 5 | -2 | 8 | 1853 | 1867 | 48.0% | -15.4 |
| 3675 | Dec 16 2003 | Robert S | 5 | 3 | James L | London XIII | - | Win | James L | 5 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 1853 | 1867 | 48.0% | +16.6 |
| 3346 | Nov 04 2003 | Robert S | 6 | 3 | James L | London XII | - | Win | James L | 6 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 1885 | 1778 | 64.9% | +11.2 |
| 3340 | Nov 04 2003 | James L | 6 | 2 | Robert S | London XII | - | Loss | James L | 2 | 6 | -4 | 8 | 1885 | 1778 | 64.9% | -20.8 |
| 3334 | Nov 04 2003 | Robert S | 7 | 2 | James L | London XII | - | Win | James L | 7 | 2 | 5 | 9 | 1885 | 1778 | 64.9% | +11.2 |
| 3328 | Nov 04 2003 | James L | 2 | 0 | Robert S | London XII | - | Loss | James L | 0 | 2 | -2 | 2 | 1885 | 1778 | 64.9% | -20.8 |
| 3205 | Sep 25 2003 | Robert S | 1 | 2 | James L | London XI | - | Loss | James L | 1 | 2 | -1 | 3 | 1881 | 1793 | 62.4% | -20.0 |
| 3199 | Sep 25 2003 | James L | 3 | 5 | Robert S | London XI | - | Win | James L | 5 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 1881 | 1793 | 62.4% | +12.0 |
| 3001 | Aug 02 2003 | Robert S | 6 | 2 | James L | Sheffield | - | Win | James L | 6 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 1880 | 1743 | 68.8% | +10.0 |
| 2865 | Aug 02 2003 | James L | 5 | 3 | Robert S | Sheffield | - | Loss | James L | 3 | 5 | -2 | 8 | 1880 | 1743 | 68.8% | -22.0 |
| 2504 | May 29 2003 | James L | 3 | 3 | Robert S | London VIII | - | - | James L | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 1747 | 1712 | 55.0% | -1.6 |
| 2489 | May 29 2003 | Robert S | 9 | 2 | James L | London VIII | - | Win | James L | 9 | 2 | 7 | 11 | 1747 | 1712 | 55.0% | +14.4 |
| 2459 | May 17 2003 | Robert S | 1 | 8 | James L | Wolverhampton | - | Loss | James L | 1 | 8 | -7 | 9 | 1738 | 1675 | 59.0% | -18.9 |
| 2423 | May 17 2003 | James L | 3 | 4 | Robert S | Wolverhampton | - | Win | James L | 4 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 1738 | 1675 | 59.0% | +13.1 |
| 1984 | Jan 08 2003 | James L | 2 | 3 | Robert S | London VI | - | Win | James L | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1843 | 1587 | 81.4% | +5.9 |
| 1978 | Jan 08 2003 | Robert S | 6 | 3 | James L | London VI | - | Win | James L | 6 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 1843 | 1587 | 81.4% | +5.9 |
| 1972 | Jan 08 2003 | James L | 3 | 2 | Robert S | London VI | - | Loss | James L | 2 | 3 | -1 | 5 | 1843 | 1587 | 81.4% | -26.1 |
| 1966 | Jan 08 2003 | Robert S | 1 | 3 | James L | London VI | - | Loss | James L | 1 | 3 | -2 | 4 | 1843 | 1587 | 81.4% | -26.1 |
| 1391 | Oct 12 2002 | James L | 3 | 5 | Robert S | Gloucester III | - | Win | James L | 5 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 1693 | 1574 | 66.5% | +10.7 |
| 1346 | Oct 12 2002 | Robert S | 5 | 2 | James L | Gloucester III | - | Win | James L | 5 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 1693 | 1574 | 66.5% | +10.7 |
| 713 | May 11 2002 | Robert S | 5 | 2 | James L | London III | - | Win | James L | 5 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 1745 | 1597 | 70.1% | +9.6 |
| 684 | May 11 2002 | James L | 0 | 7 | Robert S | London III | - | Win | James L | 7 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 1745 | 1597 | 70.1% | +9.6 |
| 293 | Feb 23 2002 | Robert S | 4 | 2 | James L | London II | - | Win | James L | 4 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 1627 | 1601 | 53.8% | +14.8 |
| 278 | Feb 23 2002 | James L | 3 | 2 | Robert S | London II | - | Loss | James L | 2 | 3 | -1 | 5 | 1627 | 1601 | 53.8% | -17.2 |
| 257 | Feb 09 2002 | James L | 1 | 2 | Robert S | Lund | - | Win | James L | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1551 | 1615 | 40.9% | +18.9 |
| 247 | Feb 09 2002 | James L | 1 | 0 | Robert S | Lund | - | Loss | James L | 0 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1551 | 1615 | 40.9% | -13.1 |
| 243 | Feb 09 2002 | Robert S | 4 | 0 | James L | Lund | - | Win | James L | 4 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 1551 | 1615 | 40.9% | +18.9 |
| 233 | Feb 09 2002 | Robert S | 7 | 2 | James L | Lund | - | Win | James L | 7 | 2 | 5 | 9 | 1551 | 1615 | 40.9% | +18.9 |
| 191 | Jan 07 2002 | Robert S | 2 | 3 | James L | London I | - | Loss | James L | 2 | 3 | -1 | 5 | 1632 | 1632 | 50.0% | -16.0 |
| 183 | Jan 07 2002 | James L | 1 | 1 | Robert S | London I | - | - | James L | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1632 | 1632 | 50.0% | +0.0 |